Saturday, May 28, 2011

Young Adult Friends Gathering Video Series – Two YAFs Reflect

By Micah Bales

This video is the eighth in a series put together from footage and interviews taken during the 2010 Young Adult Friends Gathering in Wichita, Kansas. This gathering took place over the 2010 Memorial Day Weekend and was perhaps the most diverse and balanced YAF gathering in generations. Roughly equal numbers of Liberal-Unprogrammed, Pastoral and Evangelical Friends were in attendance, along with a small number of Conservative Friends.

This video includes interviews with two Young Adult Friends who share their experiences of the 2010 YAF Gathering.

For more information about the 2010 YAF Gathering, please check out the official website, which features the advance materials that Friends were asked to use in their preparation for the conference, as well as the epistle that those gathered issued at the end of the weekend.

Micah BalesMicah Bales serves as Coordinator of Young Adult Engagement at ESR. He lives in Washington, DC with his wife, Faith Kelley. He is active with Capitol Hill Friends and is a member of Rockingham Friends Meeting, Ohio Yearly Meeting.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

A Visit to Wilmington Yearly Meeting

By Valerie Hurwitz

During the summer, faculty, administrators, students and alumni from Earlham School of Religion travel to many Yearly Meeting sessions.  In addition, we’ll also be at events such as the FUM Triennial, and a group from ESR will be traveling to Kenya and Rwanda to visit with Friends there.  Now that the academic year is quieting down, we’ll be bringing you more news from the road!

April 29-May 1, I attended Wilmington Yearly Meeting in Wilmington, OH.  Wilmington is an FUM-affiliated pastoral meeting that has part of its meetings in Ohio, and one Quarterly Meeting in Tennessee.  As you can imagine the Tennessee quarter has events centered around their meetings, and the Ohio quarters have events centered around their meetings.  People work to get to know each other across the distance, but find that this is sometimes a barrier.  The Yearly Meeting summer sessions trades off meeting in Ohio and Tennessee.  April, as you might notice, is a little early for a northern-ish yearly meeting.  Wilmington Yearly Meeting is incredibly excited to be hosting the FUM Triennial this July, and decided that in order to avoid having the Yearly Meeting business sessions and Triennial back-to-back, they would meet now for an abbreviated time.

Wilmington College is affiliated with the yearly meeting, and is the home of the Quaker Heritage Center, a Peace Center, and a Quaker Leader Scholars Program.  If you are ever traveling in that area, it’s worth stopping by the Quaker Heritage Center to see what they have on display.  The Peace Center has artifacts from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and also does conflict mediation training with children.  Dan Kasztelan, an ESR alum and campus minister, runs the Quaker Leader Scholarship program, which creates a cohort of Quakers attending Wilmington that do community service projects together, as well as community-building exercises.  The Yearly Meeting has some wonderful resources right in its backyard!

The first event I attended was a visioning exercise.  The yearly meeting has lost membership in recent years and is having serious and thoughtful conversations about envisioning the future of the Yearly Meeting.  Friends were asked to consider what are the things they like best about the yearly meeting, and what are the things they like least (or, as I would prefer to say, “the things that can be improved”).  Some of the big positives that arose in discussion were the assistance the yearly meeting gives, fellowship with other Friends, the informality of the yearly meetings, the training and recording process, and the feeling that the Spirit is moving in Wilmington Yearly Meeting.  People discussed wanting to improve the fellowship, especially between those in Ohio and those in Tennessee.  There is also a concern about keeping the Yearly Meeting relevant, about encouraging gifts (pastoral and otherwise), reflecting simplicity and Christ in the Yearly Meeting (simplifying committee structure, for example), sharing Quaker beliefs with others, and encouraging Yearly Meeting youth.  This is difficult and necessary work, and Friends were very kind to each other in this process.

That evening was the banquet, and the Quaker Leader Scholars from Wilmington College spoke about how much this program means to them.  Dan also showed a slideshow of events and travels from the last year, and I was glad to see several pictures from their trip to the YAF Gathering in Wichita, KS last May!  On Saturday the yearly meeting conducted a Bible study and their business sessions.  Wilmington YM had a limited amount of time this year for business, and encouraged Friends not to read their reports, but to summarize and move quickly.  Friends, they finished their business sessions with two hours to spare!  (Clerks, take note!)

I also wanted to share a bit of what ESR student Jon Goff (and pastor of Maryville Friends) told me about the Wilmington YM recording process.  Jon and I spoke about this during the YM sessions, and he summarized later over Facebook:

“ . . . WYM records ministers in the areas of Pastoral Minister, Chaplain, and Evangelist. I believe that's all for now, though there's been talk of other areas.

“Within each of these there are a variety of readings based on a core curriculum that each recording candidate needs to go through. I don't know the specifics of the Chaplain and Evangelist track, but in the Pastoral Minister track, some of the areas to read include Old and New Testament, Church History, Pastoral Care, Theology, Friends Studies, etc. A certain amount of reading is required in each field, which basically translates to one book each, chosen by the candidate . . . In addition, George Fox's Journal, John Woolman's Journal, and Barclay's Apology are specifically assigned. In addition to the reading, a three page report is written on each book/reading that's completed.  [It should be noted that Jon completed these requirements through ESR’s MDiv curriculum.]

“ . . . In addition, a seasoned Friend agrees to serve as a "Counselor Friend," a mentor to the candidate, meeting regularly (at least once a month, I believe, though I met with mine once a week for a lot of it) to discuss how ministry is going, serve as a sounding board and give guidance about any questions that may come up. Upon completion of the curriculum (reading and writings) and the recommendation of the Counselor Friend, the Training and Recording Committee meets to discuss recommending the candidate to YM Ministry and Counsel; approval is followed by approval, and then the recommendation comes before the Yearly Meeting at large for approval, followed by a recognition during Yearly Meeting Sessions.”

Two things struck me about this.  The first is the recognition of specific tracks within recorded ministry, not limited to pastoral ministry.  ESR’s MDiv/MMin program has several emphases: pastoral ministry, unprogrammed ministry, religious leadership, writing, pastoral care, spirituality, and peace and justice studies.  ESR works to acknowledge the breadth of different types of ministry not only in Quakerism, but also in the larger Church.  The second is the academic and interpersonal aspects of the recording process.  Candidates both must develop an academic background in relevant areas and spend time with a seasoned minister to give guidance.

Does your yearly meeting record ministers?  What is the process?  What do you think the process of recording ministers should ideally look like?

Valerie Hurwitz

Valerie Hurwitz is Director of Recruitment and Admissions at Earlham School of Religion. She lives in Richmond, Indiana and serves as choir director at West Richmond Friends Meeting.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Young Adult Friends Gathering Video Series – Sunday Evening and Monday Departure

By Micah Bales

This video is the seventh in a series put together from footage and interviews taken during the 2010 Young Adult Friends Gathering in Wichita, Kansas. This gathering took place over the 2010 Memorial Day Weekend and was perhaps the most diverse and balanced YAF gathering in generations. Roughly equal numbers of Liberal-Unprogrammed, Pastoral and Evangelical Friends were in attendance, along with a small number of Conservative Friends.

This video documents the close of the weekend gathering, with some reflections on the importance of the event.

For more information about the 2010 YAF Gathering, please check out the official website, which features the advance materials that Friends were asked to use in their preparation for the conference, as well as the epistle that those gathered issued at the end of the weekend.

Micah BalesMicah Bales serves as Coordinator of Young Adult Engagement at ESR. He lives in Washington, DC with his wife, Faith Kelley. He is active with Capitol Hill Friends and is a member of Rockingham Friends Meeting, Ohio Yearly Meeting.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Friday, May 13, 2011

Young Adult Friends Gathering Video Series – Sunday Morning and Afternoon

By Micah Bales

This video is the sixth in a series put together from footage and interviews taken during the 2010 Young Adult Friends Gathering in Wichita, Kansas. This gathering took place over the 2010 Memorial Day Weekend and was perhaps the most diverse and balanced YAF gathering in generations. Roughly equal numbers of Liberal-Unprogrammed, Pastoral and Evangelical Friends were in attendance, along with a small number of Conservative Friends.

In this video, we see footage from Sunday morning and afternoon, when YAFs joined University Friends Meeting for Bible study and worship.

For more information about the 2010 YAF Gathering, please check out the official website, which features the advance materials that Friends were asked to use in their preparation for the conference, as well as the epistle that those gathered issued at the end of the weekend.

Micah BalesMicah Bales serves as Coordinator of Young Adult Engagement at ESR. He lives in Washington, DC with his wife, Faith Kelley. He is active with Capitol Hill Friends and is a member of Rockingham Friends Meeting, Ohio Yearly Meeting.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Congratulations to ESR's 2011 Graduates

ESR celebrated graduation this past Saturday in the Earlham Wellness Center. This followed two days already rich with celebration, including the annual spring banquet on Thursday evening, and the Baccalaureate dinner and service on Friday evening. 

The graduation ceremony, which is usually held outdoors on Chase Stage, was moved inside due to the rainy spring we have had here in Richmond. ESR graduate Elizabeth Code delivered the invocation and, along with other representatives, graduate Kim Hampton welcomed the audience on behalf of ESR. In the absence of Jay Marshall, Dean of ESR, who has been on a six-month sabbatical, Tim Seid, Associate Dean, assisted President Bennett in the ceremony for the ESR graduates. Each graduate was first hooded by Phil Baisley, Assistant Professor of Pastoral Ministry, and April Vanlonden, Director of Academic Service, and were handed their diploma by Earlham President Doug Bennett. 



CLICK HERE for a full slide show of
baccalaureate and graduation photos


This year's ESR graduates are: Robin Leigh Anderson, Gabriella Gabos Cahaley, Rebecca Sue Clouse, Elizabeth Thompson Code, Patricia B. Cox, Michele A. Graham, Kimberly Rochelle Hampton, Amanda Kelly, Harold Eugene Thompson, Jr., Adam Brooks Webber, Patty Christiena Willis, David Edward Wunker, Vivian Kay Wyatt. Those expecting to graduate in December 2011 include Mary L. Collins, Bruce Edward Heckman, Rachel Elizabeth Gagné Stacy, and Silas Siboe Wanjala.

Congratulations and best wishes in your ministry!

Monday, May 9, 2011

Acting for Peace, Resisting the War Tax

By Diane Reynolds
The United States can lead the way to putting an end to wars, said Quaker activist Steve Olshewsky at a recent Peace Forum, held at ESR.
Olshewsky is a person who acts on his convictions. When he realized, years ago, as a public  accountant, how much of the average taxpayer’s earnings—about half our tax dollars-- funds warfare, he sprang into action. Since then, he has made it his life’s work to push for passage of the Peace Tax Fund Act.
This act, (HR 1191) would allow a person who was registered as a conscientious objector to have his or her war taxes put into a special fund that would be used for other government expenses. Nobody would escape paying taxes, but nobody with religious objections to war would be forced to financially support defense activities that violated their consciences. Olshewsky believes that if the U.S. would establish such a fund, it would set a worldwide standard that other countries would follow.
Olshewsky’s message-- Don’t be discouraged, do speak truth to power, change can happen--can be hard to listen in hard times, but it’s worth hearing. Olshewsky spoke to the difference ordinary citizens have made in recent history, as when Rep. Barney Frank signed on as a co-sponsor to the Peace Tax Fund bill because of letters from Friends.
At the forum, Olshewsky gave out brightly colored construction paper and pens and asked all who were so moved to write letters to Congress for sponsorship of HR 1191. Olshewsky, who said he visits every member of Congress at least once a year, promised to hand deliver the letters.
I found the “I want to believe” side of my soul stirred by Olshewsky’s enthusiasm and conviction. Can an average person circulating through the halls of Congress—a mere drop in the bucket among 300 million citizens—make a difference? Olshewsky answers with a loud yes. “No witness for conscience is ever lost,” he says. “Your voice is so powerful.” As I think back to the kind of changes early Quakers made—ensuring a degree of religious freedom, founding colonies, freeing slaves—I think, yes, perhaps we too can enact change in our times.
But the disconnect is often between the desire for change and knowing what more we can do, here and now, amid busy schedules.  The challenge is for Quaker organizations to meet volunteers where they are. Where and how can we use our energy to help in concrete ways to usher in a more peaceful world?

Diane Reynolds is a student in Earlham School of Religion’s Master of Divinity program. She maintains a personal blog, Emerging Quaker.

Friday, May 6, 2011

Young Adult Friends Gathering Video Series – Saturday Evening

By Micah Bales

This video is the fifth in a series put together from footage and interviews taken during the 2010 Young Adult Friends Gathering in Wichita, Kansas. This gathering took place over the 2010 Memorial Day Weekend and was perhaps the most diverse and balanced YAF gathering in generations. Roughly equal numbers of Liberal-Unprogrammed, Pastoral and Evangelical Friends were in attendance, along with a small number of Conservative Friends.

In this segment, we get a window into the Saturday evening of the gathering, when Friends heard a message from Dave Williams of Barclay College, followed by a time of unprogrammed worship that was blessed with a rich sense of Christ’s presence.

For more information about the 2010 YAF Gathering, please check out the official website, which features the advance materials that Friends were asked to use in their preparation for the conference, as well as the epistle that those gathered issued at the end of the weekend.

Micah BalesMicah Bales serves as Coordinator of Young Adult Engagement at ESR. He lives in Washington, DC with his wife, Faith Kelley. He is active with Capitol Hill Friends and is a member of Rockingham Friends Meeting, Ohio Yearly Meeting.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

The Trial of Amy Riggsbee

By Shelley Bourdon

The trial of Amy Riggsbee was considered to be a big story, most especially because it was occurring during the slow-news season of spring. The fall elections were behind us. Most of our stories, now that it was spring, were about local dog shows, the opening of a new business, how to protect yourself from ticks, and the importance of having your chimney cleaned during the warm months ahead. I felt honored that I, the youngest radio news-reporter at WCHL, had been given the responsibility of covering the trial of a woman who had been charged with the physical assault of a six year-old boy. Up until she was charged with assault, she had provided after-school day-care for a handful of children in her home.

On the first day of her trial, as soon as Amy was led into the courtroom, I recognized her immediately. She was one of the gray-headed “church ladies” who had provided food at a political rally of Pastor Jim White, the lay minister of a conservative Methodist church in Carrboro, NC, who had decided to run for mayor. Not only had I disliked the anti-liberal views of “Pastor Jim,” whose political campaign I had been given the charge of covering, I had not especially liked one of the older women standing behind a table serving food at that rally. She was the one with the pudgy bulldog face, the small dark eyes, and the thin, tight mouth whose corners always seemed to point to the floor. As I had walked away with my paper plate of food, I remember thinking, If she had a cigarette dangling from her mouth, the effect of her face would be complete.

When I saw that it was this very same woman who had been charged with the physical assault of a young boy, I thought, Well, of course. I knew, beyond any shade of a doubt, that she was guilty. And as the trial progressed, the physical evidence against her mounted. The most damning evidence of all was the testimony given by physician after physician—state medical examiners and local coroners—that a spiral-bound fracture, which is what x-rays revealed the break in the boy’s arm to have been—could only have been caused by a strong and repeated shaking of the young boy’s arm.

The trial lasted for four days. At the end of each day’s session, I would go into an office of the Hillsboro county courthouse, and I would phone in my hastily handwritten story to my news director. He would record my voice on to an eight-track tape which would then be played during the evening’s hour of news, sports, and weather. Because my story received top billing, minutes after I had exited the courthouse, I was able to hear my own voice, on the car radio, delivering the story of Amy’s ongoing trial. It was so obvious, from the facts I gave, and even from the tone of my own voice, that Amy Riggsbee was guilty, even if a verdict had not yet been given.

On the last day of the trial, I stood in the back of the courtroom, gazing out upon the crowded collection of court-watchers and reporters who were waiting for that clap of a gavel that meant Amy’s trial had resumed. Suddenly, I became aware of the energy of eager anticipation that filled the entire room. Folks are really enjoying this trial, I realized. And then I was struck by another thought: It’s as if all of us, in this room, are transmitting the silent message, “Burn the witch! Burn the witch!”

And then I realized that all of us in that room had known, right from the very beginning, that Amy was guilty as hell. It was so obvious. We could see it on her angry, defensive face; we could hear it in the testimony that had been given. Even the “positive” character-witness testimony had been weak. It had amounted to nothing more than a few of her gray-headed “church lady” friends testifying, under oath, that “Amy could never have done such a thing. She’s a true Christian lady.” All of us, every single one of us in that courtroom, wanted to see Amy pay for what she had done to an innocent little boy. How dare she? People like that should be locked away. “Burn the witch!” were the silent words that continued to bat around us in the courtroom.

And then I was struck by a deeper thought, one that pierced my heart and left me feeling stunned: Every single one of us in that room, I suddenly realized, was capable of shaking too hard the arm of a little boy who wasn’t doing what he was supposed to do. And since we were all capable of what Amy had done, we were all, therefore, guilty. It just hadn’t yet happened to us, but it could. And then I realized that’s why everyone was enjoying Amy’s trial so much. Better her than us, we were all thinking. If she paid for this crime, then maybe we would never find ourselves in her situation.

And, in that moment, I also realized that Amy was, indeed, exactly as her gray-headed “church lady” friends had testified. She was a “true Christian lady.” She went to church every Sunday. She publicly professed her Christian beliefs each week. She baked pies and served on committees. She cleaned the church kitchen after the weekly spaghetti dinners on Sundays. She was one of those members of a church that folks could depend upon; and yet, she had made a mistake. Suddenly, it was as if a great weight was upon me. None of us, I thought to myself, had any right to judge Amy. She could, very easily, be each and every one of us. But we didn’t want to be reminded of that, so we placed an invisible wall between herself and us. She was “bad.” We were “good.” Burn the witch!

As I stared at the back of Amy Riggsbee’s gray grandmotherly head, I felt like I could have cried. Amy didn’t have children of her own. Her husband was dead. She’d been caring for a group of kids as a way of supplementing her late husband’s Social Security. True, she probably didn’t have the best disposition for a child-care provider, but the money had been good, better than she would have made working as a clerk at the local A&P, and besides that, watching kids in her own home had meant she didn’t have to stand on her feet for long hours at a time. But now it was beginning to look as if she would be spending some, if not all, of her last years in a prison.

I found myself filled with a strong urge to write about Amy from this newfound perspective. I could help others to feel the compassion for her that I was now feeling. And, perhaps, if she really did go to prison, I could visit her, maybe even write a follow-up story about her. At the very least, I could be her friend. Those little old ladies from her church—the ones who had testified that Amy could never have broken the arm of a little boy—I imagined that they probably wouldn’t be traveling to the state prison to visit her. The growing feeling in my heart was that Amy needed a friend. Write this new kind of a story about Amy, the feeling of my heart seemed to be saying. I knew the story would work better in a print format rather than broadcast. And since the local paper had already printed one of my stories, they would probably print this story as well.

It was such a beautiful idea, and it might very well have produced some beautiful results; but, unfortunately, I became afraid. I didn’t want to be the one reporter who became associated with “the witch.” I didn’t want to stand out in this way. It was okay to stand out as a good-sounding “radio voice” on the air, but to come forward, publicly, in writing, as a person who had compassion for a woman who had broken the arm of a little boy… would people think that I supported this kind of violence against children?

I felt like such a shit, but the story I wrote about Amy’s trial that day was like all the other stories of her case I had written, except for the fact that it had a definitive conclusion: on that day in the Hillsboro county courthouse, Amy received a verdict of “guilty.” She would, indeed, be heading to prison. She’s guilty as hell; here are the facts, were the gist of my story that day. The only compassionate concession I made was that I withheld one bit of information. One of the mothers of another boy Amy had cared for had heard Amy yelling at the children through the door one afternoon, “God damn it, I told you to shut up!” I left that fact out of my story.

My news director was livid once he discovered, the next day, that I had left out a key piece of damning evidence against Amy. “What’s wrong with you?” he yelled.

“I felt sorry for her,” I said. “Things were bad enough for her. I didn’t want her situation to be worse.”

“That’s not your job to feel sorry for folks,” he said. “You’re here to report the news. I expect the facts, all the facts. Do you understand?”
“Yes, Stephen, I understand.”

But what neither Stephen nor I understood was that I was, that very day, going to discover that I had lost my ability to write.

Shelley BourdonShelley Bourdon is an ESR Access student earning an MDiv/MMin degree.  She is spending the 2010-2011 year in residence at ESR to take Ministry of Writing courses.  Shelley has attended Maury River Friends Meeting (Baltimore YM) and Clear Creek Friends Meeting (Ohio Valley YM), as well as several contemplative prayer groups.  She has lived on this planet for half a century, and been married to a mathematician for 28 years.  She has two grown children and has worked as a journalist, a radio broadcaster, and a homeschooling mom.

Monday, May 2, 2011

The Light of Christ: an Integrated Christology Embedded in Quaker Roots

By Wayne Williams

Maurice Creasy, a 20th century Quaker theologian, discusses the original Christological understanding of founding Friends as being able to hold the “particular and the universal, the historical and the mystical emphasis” of Jesus together in unity.  The salvific significance and power of Jesus concerned “the universal and divine light of Christ”.  He argues that the teaching of early Quakers regarding this Light was an understanding that had to do with the action of God, not man.  God showed Godself in Jesus, and what God showed IS in all men.  This Light is innate in everyone, and we all have access to Christ’s Light eternally.

Teach these new disciples to obey all the commands I have given you. And be sure of this: I am with you always, even to the end of the age. (Matt 28:20 NLT)

Jesus’ recorded life in Scripture embodied love and compassion.  Through the Gospel narratives, Jesus exhorted and challenged others and the status quo.  Early Quakers believed the embodied expressions and witness of Jesus as being active and present at all times working in and through all persons everywhere.[1]

Salvation through Christ came not through mere possession of this personal Illumination.  Obedience to the discerned leadings of Christ was required to fulfill God’s purpose.  Early Quakers were concerned with an orthopraxy of ethics and action, not liturgy.  Though every person everywhere has access to this Light, few respond with the required action to manifest Jesus’ saving and transforming Power.  

Creasey writes that early Friends were observing in their contemporaries a lip-service glorification of Christ.  The established Church’s ignorance of Christ’s relation to Creation was evidenced “by an uncritical acceptance of social, political, economic, and military methods.”  Early Quakers also criticized the Church of putting a higher value on the “intellectual apprehension of doctrine” than a Spiritual transformation.  For founding Friends, belief in the Lordship of Christ implied transformation of the total individual through living through the promptings of Christ’s Spirit.

Those who so knew Christ themselves to have been delivered not only from penalty of sin but also from its power.  They found themselves, moreover, gathered into a community in which were to be known, not merely as a doctrine or an idea, but in reality and in daily life, both the fellowship of Christ’s sufferings and the power of Christ’s resurrection.[2]

Creasey seems to lament the loss of the original vision that Friends had.  This was an integrated understanding to the saving purpose of Christ.  He argues that the once united interworking concept of Christ embraced the particular and universal, historical and mystical, that these emphases among Friends have become polarized, divided, and in some circles even faded out of view.  It is the component elements’ relationship to one another that gives our comprehension weight and depth.  Our once integrated and comprehensive Christology was a keystone to our Society’s original unity and subsequent growth.  To discuss today our Society’s diverse Christologies (or lack thereof) can occasion division or even offense.  This is saddening, given the fact that Christ once stood as a unifying ideology among our own founding visionaries.  The time is ripe to reconsider our corporate vision of Jesus in relation to our current need for transforming the uncritical social, economic, political, and ethical powers and principalities at work in today’s world.



[1] Creasey, Maurice. Christ in Early Quakerism, (Philadelphia: The Tract Association of Friends, undated).
[2] Creasey, Maurice. Christ in Early Quakerism, (Philadelphia: The Tract Association of Friends, undated).

Wayne WilliamsWayne is a current MDiv student at Earlham School of Religion. He is a member of Brooklyn Monthly Meeting, New York Yearly Meeting.